Acid Logic - Pop Culture and humor in one easy to digest package!
home columns features interviews fiction guestbook blogs
The low calorie pop culture web site for people on the go! A ForbistheMighty.com production

On Spec

By Tom “re-tooling” Waters
June 1, 2008

I’ve always felt that this is the wrong era for the personal essay. Essays these days are gussied up to be something else: rants, blogs, columns, feature length critiques and other names that all mean the same thing with slight variations on the stringency of the structure. With the dawn of the internet, too, many say that the printed word is on the way out. I highly doubt that.

It’s been said that writing is 25% inspiration and 75% perspiration, or something like that. I’ve never been good with quotes (aside from films that I’ve watched dozens of times), but you know which quote I’m referring to. I don’t agree. I’ve always thought it was presumptuous and arrogant to pen dissertations on ’the craft’ of writing or the wages we suffer for our ’art’, but somehow, I always get drawn in to writing about writing again. I read a review about the Coen brothers a few months ago that struck a deep chord in me that’s been resonating ever since. The writer made an observation that many writer/directors run out of their own source material sooner or later, and when that happens, they either fade away or find a new means of expressing their talents by shining a light on other people’s work. The film was No Country For Old Men, and indeed, the film garnered four Oscar Awards and an avalanche of critical praise.

I’ve often been plagued since my early 20’s with a deep seated concern that I’d run out of personal source material to write about. After all, there are only so many daily tasks, personal observations and pithy opinions to spring forth from one person’s head, right? And my credo for writing the personal essay has always been to keep it timeless; before my first successful flush as a freelance writer, I never knew when or where something was going to appear, so I made every attempt to give my work a context outside of current events. That, and there are more than enough political columnists, moralistic crusaders and observationalistic pundits to spin out their safe and concise feelings in a journalistically chipper manner.

So where does that put me? In a state of mind where I’m looking for a challenge but I’m not sure what it is. Where I want to evolve and adapt but I’m not sure if it means wandering outside of the medium that I excel in (and that I’ve been told I’m good at), or finding a different avenue inside of the form that I’m using. It’s a real pickle. After an excruciatingly long block, I survived with the ability to write something longer than a paragraph when spring arrived. Lately, though, I’m wondering if I could use some more time out, though.

My friend Christina (another fellow writer) always put a positive spin on blocks, telling me that a lot of writers can come out of a ’fallow’ period renewed, refreshed and ready to expound on everything they’d experienced. There is some truth to that, as you can’t write about life if you’ve encapsulated everything that you’re going through and stopped living. You often need to go through some of life’s unscripted hurtles and wait for them to happen. Plot points don’t just pop up on cue. And still, there’s a sense that it’s time to metamorphose into something else.

After a month long burst of manuscript submissions, I got the usual volley of rejection emails along with some thoughtful, insightful and well-put feedback from publishers and agents who were interested, yet not willing to take the risk. It was enough to keep me going. A publishing house told me that they’d read the manuscript back to front and had many heated discussions in the office about it, but they were passing. One agent emailed me to say that publishers were only representing ’thematic’ collections of essays while another informed me (very politely, mind you) that the industry won’t take a chance on an unknown when it comes to the essay form. It’s all well and good for celebrities to make some extra advance money with a ghost-written memoir based on recorded interviews with a hired writer, but not an unknown. It’s perfectly acceptable for an established writer to make a name for himself writing novels or plays or science fiction fantasies first and then put out a collection of essays, but not an unknown. Strangely enough, none of this was discouraging. I’ve always felt that this is the wrong era for the personal essay. Essays these days are gussied up to be something else: rants, blogs, columns, feature length critiques and other names that all mean the same thing with slight variations on the stringency of the structure. With the dawn of the internet, too, many say that the printed word is on the way out. I highly doubt that.

Creatively speaking, I’ve also nurtured a feeling that, in a sense, the old guard has to fall before new voices can be heard. The young bucks of a prior era carve out their niche in an already crowded market, protect their territory and slowly wither away into literary insignificance, immortality or obscurity, whether it’s in newspapers, magazines, publishing houses or beyond. How can you tell when the vacuum hits, though? When does this shift in culture occur? That’s a tough nut to crack. Maybe it arrives when the younger voices reach their pinnacle and find the means to wake the sleeping giant that is their generation. Perhaps it arrives once the old guard loosen their grip on an established clique and bring some young upstarts into the fold.

I’ve also been haunted since my early ’20s with a deep, almost spiritual yearning to write a piece that scratches the surface of a buried Truth, something that encompasses what everyone my age has felt as a shared experience. To write something that transcends and inspires that’s beyond my own existence. I can’t even put my finger on the feeling, and I’m having a hard time even describing it, but I know how it feels to be close to the goal. It’s like a creative dowsing rod, going off the charts whenever my train of thought gets near the state lines of what I’m looking for. I could spend the rest of my life trying to write that piece and never hit it, but I’m going to keep trying.

Lately, though, even though I have the ability to write and a desire to write, I haven’t had any inspiration to write with. This is new territory, and it makes me wonder if I should sit back a little longer or start noodling out and tinkering with some different formats or mediums. I can’t be the only person who’s gone through this. I’m sure every (not using the A word, no sir) creative type has experienced this sort of critical juncture in their career. It bears more thought, more meditation. Like all ideas, it deserves some time to incubate or gestate until it’s ready to reveal itself. If my work isn’t growing or evolving, then it’s time to stop. The day that I don’t feel like I’m breaking new ground (even when it might not seem like it) is the day I’ll hang up my hat and call it quits. The odds of that happening are slim, though. With an inquisitive nature, an opinionated character, a coping mechanism that gnaws at me to make sense out of the world I live in in order to live in it, and a deep-seated need to be acknowledged on a level that’s abnormal for civilians and run-of-the-mill for (not using the A word here, either) right brain people, that won’t happen any time soon. Thanks for taking the journey with me so far.