By Wil Forbis
November
15th, 2000
By the time you read this, we can only hope that the powers that be
have decided whom to elect as president of our fine nation, and have
allowed us to focus our attention back to more important issues such
as whether to wear matching socks or how to get the VCR to record "The
Michael Richards Show." I say this not to belittle our new leader (he
will be more than capable of doing that himself) but rather as a grim
nod to the fact that on a variety of issues, the two candidates thrown
before the American populace on Election 2000 had frighteningly similar
opinions. On subjects like the death penalty, the WTO, or three strikes
laws, Gore and Bush offered little to distinguish themselves from each
other. And perhaps nowhere was this clearer than the United States war
on drugs. Both supported it, wholly and unconditionally, and for the
most part had the will of the people behind them.
I have to confess, that at one point I supported the war on drugs
myself. This was back when I thought that by "war on drugs" they meant,
"Let's go have a war while being on drugs." I found the thought of taking
out Charlie at three o'clock while being under the effects of two grams
of cocaine nothing sort of exhilarating and fully endorsed the concept.
It wasn't until much later when I realized that the war was actually
against drugs, that I had to re-examine my views.
When I found out what the war on drugs really was - a well intentioned
but ignoble attempt to do away with something than has been with mankind
through its evolution, and a bloody campaign that has left a trail of
destruction from the ghettos of America to the villages of Central America,
and leading up to the American Bill of Rights - then I knew it was time
to lend my powerful but underused voice to the cause and write this
piece.
A variety of anti-drug war treatises have been published in recent
years laying out the facts for the cause of reforming the drug laws.
I myself, have always found facts quite burdensome at best, and avoid
their use. Besides, I'm sure you're all quite familiar with the facts
that the pro-drug camp uses - the 1976 study that shows marijuana ingested
by monkeys actually caused them to show an increased interest in Russian
novelists, Nabokov in particular, or that squirrels on cocaine were
able to perform even the most complex Kirov ballets. These studies however,
only argue for legalization of drugs from a cold, statistical viewpoint,
whereas I'm more prepared to make my case on moral grounds.
Now, I've always been wary of crimes where both the supposed victim
and perpetrator are making and active attempt to avoid being caught
(e.g. prostitution, drug sales, etc.) These are called "consensual
crimes" because nobody involved is doing anything they don't want
to be doing. There is perhaps one consensual crime I can think of that
I would not support, and that would be selling dangerous and illegal
weapons to terrorists, as it most likely the person buying the weapon
has some type of non-consensual crime (e.g. mass-murder) on his immediate
to-do list. This is not the case with, say, buying pot, where the immediate
plan is to run home, watch late-night infomercials and consume an entire
bag of Fritos. Clearly, that act should not be a crime. (Though a strong
case could be made for it being a misdemeanor.)
This is the ethical basis upon which I question the validity of the
modern drug war. In an attempt to stop people from doing exactly what
they want to do, we've managed to fill our prisons up to such a degree
that we have to parole violent offenders early to free up space. We've
had to pressure our South American neighbors into launching doomed police
actions against drug cartels whom have responded with numerous acts
of violence against civilians and legal officials. We've allowed segments
our own city streets to be taken over by criminals who have no qualms
about murdering innocents while our police kill
American citizenry when cases of mistaken identity occur during
the enforcement of drug laws.
Critics of the drug legalization will always state that this is all
done for the greater good, because drugs take lives. If so, why aren't
we criminalizing alcohol or tobacco, both of which kill in far greater
numbers than illegal drugs (Click
here for actual numbers.) Or more importantly, why don't we acknowledge
that, hey, people die, whether it be from drinking, drugs, red meat
or hang gliding. Such is the cost of liberty.
Now that I have armed you, the loyal Acid Logic reader, with this
impassioned plea, I implore you to join me in more direct action. United,
let us storm the nation's capitol and show our country's politicians
that the readership of Acid Logic is a force to be reckoned with. When
armed with the truth we have the power to bring forth justice in this
country and our vast numbers will put right what has been wrong for
so long. No longer will this country's politicians laugh at us (particularly
me) when we call their offices and tell them that Acid Logic is a potent
political tool. No longer will this country's politicians imprison us
(particularly me) when we hide in their closets wearing only a water
bucket and knee high striped socks and leap out at their arrival in
an attempt make a social commentary that's purpose has long since faded
from memory. I summon you, my brethren, to join me in a Million Maniac
March upon this nation's capitol next Thursday. (Friday, if I can't
get my hair appointment moved.)
See you there.
What do you think America?
Leave
your comments on the Guestbook!
Wil Forbis is a
well known international playboy who lives a fast paced life attending
chic parties, performing feats of derring-do and making love to the
world's most beautiful women. Together with his partner, Scrotum-Boy,
he is making the world safe for democracy. Email - acidlogic@hotmail.comVisit Wil's web log, My So-Called Penis, and receive complete enlightenment.
